Skip to main content
Freicore

Field execution control

Answers you
can prove.

Software for the people who answer for execution on complex new-build projects — and for the ones who have to report it upwards.

  • Industrial facilities
  • Data centres
  • Industrial energy
  • Manufacturing plants
  • Automated logistics
  • Process infrastructure

The three answers

01

Bearing controls the project

Scope, labour, progress and progress claims in one workflow. Available now.

02

Root reads the cable schedule

Your own XLSX, opened as it is. Nothing imported, nothing uploaded. Available now.

03

Neither fits — we build it

A control system fitted to one project, on the execution-control backbone.

01 — Bearing

Where are we, with proof.

Contract scope, weekly progress, labour and certified money stay one linked record instead of five spreadsheets that quietly drift apart.

  • BOQ / WBS with Excel import 01
  • Planned, earned and actual labour 02
  • Progress claims and certificates 03
Request access See the tour
Bearing dashboard: scope and extra-work KPI tiles, labour efficiency, commercial exposure, and the section progress trend against the planned baseline
Dashboard. Demonstration project — every company, person and figure is invented.
Root: the equipment list with MCC-02 selected, and the returned cables showing both ends with the spreadsheet row each was read from
One click on MCC-02 returns twelve cables — ten read from the from column, two from to. An autofilter returns ten or two, never twelve.

02 — Root

A cable has two ends.

An autofilter has one column. Root asks both and returns every cable on that equipment — each with the row it was read from.

No import, no upload, no server. The engine runs in your browser tab.

Request access How it reads a sheet

Guides

All 4 →

Tell us where control
is breaking down.

The site workflow, the reporting gap, and which of the three answers fits. We reply within one business day.

Start the conversation